Wizard of Oz Better as Book or Film Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Wizard of Oz Better as Book or Film - Term makeup ExampleHowever, this seeming young trend actually has a long hi report. Examples of this exist as outlying(prenominal) back as the beginning of the film industry with Hollywoods early interpretation of Tennysons poem Enoch Arden in 1911. Unfortunately, film representations such as this struggle desperately to provide an accurate delight of text originally presented in invigorated form. The some(prenominal) fans of the Harry Potter series ar amply aware that film, while interesting and entertaining in its ability to bring out certain elements of the story that might have been missed in the reading, can never duplicate the full depth and artistic production of the novel. Yet translating book to film is not always fully detractive. Sometimes, film can add artistic elements that may or may not help to inform the meanings intended within the book. Because more recent films are able to dazzle with amazing special effects and digit al imagery, it is better to compare a film of the past which was more hold to simply telling the story. To illustrate the differences between film and novel, then, it is laborsaving to compare something like Victor Flemings 1939 filmic rendition of Frank L. Baums novel The Wonderful Wizard of Oz both in terms of medium and zeitgeist of the age in which each were made. Numerous differences exist between the film and the novel, many of which can be said to be minor but which also tend to generalize solid details of the book. Clearly, the film is limited in its ability to tell the story because of time constraints. While the novel could be as long as it needed to be to properly tell the story, the film is limited to two or three hours at most before it starts losing the interest of the audience. It is for this reason that the more detail details of the book are lost within the film. However, the film adds additional components such as secure in the form of music and voice. This cr eates a stronger emotional draw than just reading the words. Throughout the film, the actors are also able to provide a greater sense of personality as they carry thoughts and emotions done facial expressions and actions rather than simply in narration. Some transmutes were made purely as part of the zeitgeist and change of medium, such as changing the silver slippers from the book to ruby red slippers for the film. This change was made to lock advantage of the new color film technology that was then being introduced in Hollywood and employ as a distinguishing feature between Kansas and Oz. Changes in wording, such as transitioning from the Tin Woodsman found in the novel to Tinman in the film are reflective of the changes in language that took place between 1900 England and 1937 America. However, even such a small change causes the story to lose some of the artistic paronomasia present in the book. While these are all small changes, larger changes are also present. In both pr esentations, book and novel, the story begins in a gray and drab Kansas, but this depiction is instead different between the two mediums, again reflecting changing zeitgeist. In the book, Dorothy and her family are quite isolated to the pourboire that Dorothy can see nothing but the great gray prairie on every side. Not a tree nor a house broke the broad sweep of flat country that reached to the edge of the toss in all directions (1-2). In the film, Dorothy is not quite as isolated as she is first seen do her way home from school along a dirt road on which she is able to interact with several other members of her community. Dorothys house has also been changed from the simple four walls, a floor and a detonating device described in the book to a comfortable frame house in the film in which Dorothy has her own room indicating the family exists in a comfortable middle class